• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Court in Justice

CourdinJustice

  • Evidence Archive
  • Justice & Courts
    • Institutional Inertia
    • Procedural Errors
  • Law Enforcement
    • Procedural Errors
    • IGP (Police Oversight)
    • Judicial Council (Courts Oversight)
  • National Bodies
    • Ombudsman / National Bodies
    • Data Privacy Violations
    • Discrimination & HR
  • Contact Us

plainte parquet inertie institutionnelle remich 2025

mars 18, 2026 by

Plainte formelle au Parquet : Inertie institutionnelle systémique et négligence judiciaire

Le 20261205une plainte juridique formelle a été déposée sous la référence RKV–PARQUET–001, adressée au Parquet de Luxembourg. Ce document constitue un compte rendu critique de la défaillance systémique au sein du système de justice régional. Le cœur de la plainte détaille comment les forces de police locales de Remich ont fait preuve d'une inaction prolongée pendant plusieurs années. Malgré de nombreux signalements concernant des activités criminelles et des menaces pour la sécurité d'un mineur, le Procureur d'État et les services associés n'ont pas entamé les procédures judiciaires nécessaires ni transmis les dossiers pour des poursuites ultérieures.

Such a deliberate omission constitutes a grave Institutional Inertia, resulting in the denial of justice and the effective protection of rights for Rossen Kirilov. The documentation provides a clear timeline showing that administrative silence was used to ignore documented evidence, ultimately leading to the severe deterioration of a child’s health and future prospects. This case is currently categorized as Ignored by the prosecution because, despite the formal submission of these grievances, the relevant authorities have continued to bypass formal judicial oversight. This lack of accountability highlights a broader pattern of institutional neglect that undermines the rule of law.

Violation Summary:Procureur d'État


Complaint regarding years of police inertia in Remich, failing to forward criminal reports to the prosecutor's office, resulting in the destruction of a child's health and future.


Contexte juridique / Violations potentielles

Code of Criminal Procedure (Code de procédure pénale - Art. 23+); Art. 8 ECHR; CRC; CRPD

Primary Sidebar

Our mission

Този портал е създаден с цел документиране и публично огласяване на системни нарушения на основните човешки права, институционална инертност и липса на ефективни правни средства за защита в рамките на административната и съдебната система на Люксембург.

Нашата мисия е да предоставим неоспорими доказателства за т.нар. ‘stonewalling’ (системно блокиране на информация и правосъдие) и да потърсим институционална отговорност чрез пълна прозрачност. Вярваме, че гражданският контрол и публичността са единственият начин за справяне с административната некомпетентност и нарушенията на закона, които застрашават основните свободи на гражданите.

Categories

  • Aucune catégorie

Categories

  • Aucune catégorie

Copyright © 2026 · Court in Justice · Created by Stojos ·

  • Case Studies
  • Institutional Accountability
  • Access to Information
  • Civil Monitor
  • Jurisdictions
We've detected you might be speaking a different language. Do you want to change to:
Change language to English English
Change language to English English
French
Change language to German German
Change language to Luxembourgish Luxembourgish
Change language to Bulgarian Bulgarian
Change Language
Close and do not switch language
French
English German Luxembourgish Bulgarian